Radioactive overview: Marie Curie biopic fizzes however would not spark


Studio Canal

Midway by Radioactive, streaming on Amazon Prime now, one thing unusual occurs. What seems to be a by-the-numbers biopic splits in two, its narrative thrown astray by a coincidence. The story shatters. The ending that appeared inevitable cannot occur anymore. For a second it appears as if the movie is likely to be about to flee its system and develop into one thing fully new. 

Sadly, it would not fairly make it. Marjane Satrapi’s biography of Marie Curie is a portrait of a girl who broke by scientific and social boundaries, however it by no means breaks freed from its style’s restrictions.

Marie Curie found polonium and radium. She reworked our understanding of science and the world round us. She was the primary girl to win a Nobel prize — twice, in actual fact, and in two completely different disciplines. Her examine of radiation led to medical breakthroughs and ushered within the atomic age. However in Radioactive, all of this takes a again seat to the truth that in the future she met a pleasant man and married him.

Scripted by Jack Thorne and based mostly on Lauren Redniss’ award-winning graphic novel, Radioactive charts a predictable route by Curie’s life and work. It ticks all of the inspirational biographical containers within the course of: lingering photographs of glowing beakers and bunsen burners, straight-laced sexist baddies to conquer and lots of ominous coughing into handkerchieves. However there’s one thing larger and darker effervescent just below the floor.


Rosamund Pike and Sam Riley as Marie and Pierre Curie.

Studio Canal

Rosamund Pike (Gone Woman, Jack Reacher) is brittle and compelling because the prickly however good scientist. Born Maria Skłodowska, Marie is a Polish immigrant decided to additional her scientific analysis in Paris. She’s up towards nationalist sentiments and a male-dominated institution — at one level she wonders aloud whether or not she’s being mistreated due to her nationality or her gender. When she’s alienated from academia, assist comes within the type of future husband Pierre Curie (Sam Riley, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil), who provides her lab area and turns into her scientific collaborator.

Maybe it should not be a shock that the movie begins and ends with the Curies’ relationship. The graphic novel is known as Radioactive: Marie & Pierre Curie, A Story of Love and Fallout. And though the film drops Pierre’s identify from the title, it nonetheless lavishes him with frankly undeserved consideration. Riley’s efficiency is likable sufficient, however Pierre’s character feels underwritten.

It is not as if there is not loads of potential for battle and spark between the Curies. Marie is reluctant to share credit score together with her husband in a world that desires to brush her apart. Pierre is an unconventional scientist by right now’s requirements, fascinated by spiritualism and keen on working bare by fields. However regardless of their quirks, it is exhausting to inform what they see in one another. For on a regular basis they spend collectively in laboratories, there’s surprisingly little chemistry.

Pike’s most arresting scenes do not contain her husband in any respect. She’s at her greatest when butting heads together with her headstrong daughter, performed by a scene-stealing Anya Taylor-Pleasure (star of The Witch, Cut up and Emma). Irène Curie has inherited her mom’s sharp tongue, ardour for science, and sheer, cussed willpower. Whereas Pierre provides much-needed assist to Marie, it is Irène who pushes her to beat her greatest fears.

It would not be honest to say there’s nothing attention-grabbing about Marie Curie’s private life. It was so scandalous, in actual fact, that it overshadowed her work. However that drama performs out all too predictably in Radioactive, from the outraged headlines to Curie’s defiant look earlier than a roomful of cheering ladies. 

When does it get attention-grabbing? The clue’s within the identify. 

Radioactive is a horror film disguised as a biopic. The lethal unintended effects of working with radiation do not develop into obvious till it is too late. As Curie’s accomplishments develop, we see glimpses of the longer term her analysis helped to construct: Medical breakthroughs come hand in hand with the 20th-century nightmares of Hiroshima and Chernobyl. A sequence set within the nuclear take a look at web site at Doom City, Nevada, vividly contrasts kitschy 1950s optimism with the sheer harmful drive of the bomb. 


Please, Madame, placed on some gloves!

Studio Canal

The film attracts a parallel between Curie and Alfred Nobel, the Swedish chemist and “service provider of dying” who patented gunpowder. Regardless of the human price of his creation, he is now greatest identified for founding the awards that remember scientific progress. It is no coincidence the Curies’ first Nobel prize is juxtaposed with a scene of the Enola Homosexual dropping the primary atomic bomb on Hiroshima.

Curie herself would not escape the results of her work. Her discoveries deliver her the popularity she craves, however her personal life erupts in private tragedy and scandal. And she or he’s finally pressured to acknowledge that the brand new components she found are making individuals sick. At her lowest level, she’s seen not as certainly one of France’s foremost scientists. As a substitute she’s “the soiled Pole who invented a poison that the world thought marvelous.” When she succumbs to aplastic anemia after years of publicity to radioactive materials, she’s pressured to confront the price of her life’s work.

Director Satrapi is maybe greatest generally known as the creator of Persepolis, an autobiographical sequence of comics and an animated film about her upbringing in Iran. However regardless of Radioactive’s supply materials and Satrapi’s background in visible artwork, it is an aesthetically disappointing expertise. There are some putting pictures — a take a look at dummy melting in a nuclear blast, a luminous vial in Curie’s darkish bed room, the desolate dreamscape she explores in her closing scenes — however they’re scattered by a movie that handles its extraordinary subject material all too cautiously.

Radioactive appears engineered to sit down alongside uplifting historic tales like The King’s Speech and The Aeronauts (additionally scripted by Thorne), however its darkish undercurrents make it an uneasy match within the style. There isn’t any denying Marie Curie’s accomplishments or her place in historical past, however her legacy is extra difficult than Radioactive’s love story.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply